top of page
Search

Beyond the Perfection Paradox: Redefining Perfectionism in the Workplace

By Dr. Meagan Yarmey, PhD, MA, MSW, RSW


Perfectionism in the workplace is a paradox that reveals the tension between systemic pressures and individual wellbeing. Organizations often celebrate perfectionism in the workplace—polished presentations, meticulous planning, impeccable reports—yet beneath the surface, this drive can sabotage success, stifle creativity, and drain mental energy. Understanding the roots of perfectionism in the workplace—and its ties to core beliefs—can help professionals trade rigidity for resilience.


Navigating the Paradox: A worker sits between the allure of perfectionism and the chaos of self-doubt in the workplace.
Navigating the Paradox: A worker sits between the allure of perfectionism and the chaos of self-doubt in the workplace.

The Irony of System vs. Individual

Perfectionism in the workplace rarely emerges in isolation. It’s driven by deeply held core beliefs—automatic assumptions shaped by family, education, and cultural values (Beck, 1976). Community psychologists remind us that these beliefs develop within systems that reinforce comparison and competition (Prilleltensky, 2008).


Ironically, the same systems that fuel perfectionism in the workplace rarely reward healthy self-reflection. Instead, they encourage overcommitment and over-functioning—behaviors that appear productive but often mask burnout and anxiety (Maslach & Leiter, 2016). Organizational psychologists have found that workplaces frequently equate perfectionism with competence (Stoeber et al., 2020), making it hard to separate genuine excellence from systemic pressure.


Redefining Perfectionism in the Workplace

This isn’t to say that striving for excellence has no place in professional life. But let’s be clear:

  • Excellence means pursuing quality within realistic, healthy limits.

  • Perfectionism in the workplace means chasing flawlessness to avoid shame or gain external validation—often at the expense of mental health.


Defining excellence in the workplace requires asking:

  • What outcomes truly matter?

  • What’s within my control?

  • How can I maintain high standards without equating worth with performance?


The Psychology of Perfectionism in the Workplace

Perfectionistic thinking often includes biased attention (focusing on flaws), black-and-white thinking (good or bad, no middle ground), and overgeneralizing from past experiences (Beck, 1976; Frost et al., 1990). These patterns are amplified by organizational cultures that promote constant evaluation, competition, and external validation—hallmarks of perfectionism in the workplace (Stoeber & Damian, 2016).


When companies reward the “ideal worker” who’s always available, never wrong, and constantly exceeding expectations, they reinforce perfectionism in the workplace and discourage authentic growth.


Advocating for Yourself Within a Culture of Perfectionism in the Workplace

Challenging perfectionism in the workplace requires experimentation and self-advocacy:

  • Experiment with imperfection—share an unfinished idea, give a presentation without slides, or ask for feedback before perfecting a draft.

  • Set boundaries—define what “good enough” looks like, including time limits.

  • Build peer support—seek mentors and allies who challenge the myth that you must always be perfect.

  • Redefine success—shift from “I must be the best” to “I will learn, grow, and contribute meaningfully.”


Final Reflections

Perfectionism in the workplace is not just an individual trait; it’s a learned response to systems that benefit from perpetual striving. By examining the core beliefs driving our behaviors—and the cultures that sustain them—we can redefine excellence on our own terms.


Because perfectionism in the workplace doesn’t build sustainable success; it builds burnout. Let’s aim higher—not for flawlessness, but for meaningful work that values our humanity.


References:


Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press.


Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14(5), 449–468.


Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111.


Prilleltensky, I. (2008). The role of power in wellness, oppression, and liberation: The promise of psychopolitical validity. Journal of Community Psychology, 36(2), 116–136.


Stoeber, J., & Damian, L. E. (2016). Perfectionism in employees: Work engagement, workaholism, and burnout. In Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (Eds.), Perfectionism in the workplace: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 97–121). American Psychological Association.


Stoeber, J., et al. (2020). Perfectionism and performance: A systematic review of the literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(2), 116–135.


About the Author:

Dr. Meagan Yarmey, PhD, RSW, is a Registered Social Worker and Social-Personality Psychologist who helps professionals navigate anxiety, burnout, and perfectionism in the workplace using evidence-based, integrative approaches rooted in social, community, and organizational psychology.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page